Have
you read any of the “original” Robin Hood stories? I had to read at least one,
and I settled on Howard Pyle’s.
// REVIEW //
My
review is a bit torn between two. Robin Hood in this retelling was nothing but
a rogue and restless fellow. There was no King Richard for whom he was fighting
behind the sheriff’s back. Instead, he was just at odds with the sheriff and
the sheriff could not overcome him or his men. So, there really wasn’t much
noble in Robin’s character here. That, I really couldn’t admire.
On the flip side, the humor in this was
hysterical. I had several laughing aloud moments. I can appreciate good wit,
and the merry men surely had it. Of course, as with any wit, it did go too far
at times.
There was a heavy theme of
drinking throughout the pages. The only form of Christianity would be the
priests who cares more for their purse than their parishes (which was to be a
revealing of hypocrisy). There was next to no romance (sorry, no maid Marion in
this book, besides her name being mentioned once). It’s possible that the songs
they sung could have had some questionable content, but I’ll be honest and confess
that I skipped over the poetry, so I don’t know what they contain.
A good way to think of this book is as a
collection of short tales of Robin Hood, as the flow wasn’t exactly
novel-type.
The adventures were
a mix of fun and some with which I could not approve (they just lacked the
integrity and nobility that I have seen in Robin in other retellings). I could
revisit some of the stories and cannot say I wish I hadn’t read it.
No comments:
Post a Comment