When it comes to Jane Austen retellings, this is probably
one of the best that I’ve read, as in there was enough of Austen to know what
was going on and how it was implied, but there were also enough original
creativity to where I didn’t think, “Well if I wanted to read Austen, I would have
just read Austen.” What Debra did with her characters was very clever and
creative and fit so well for a modern “Pride and Prejudice.” If she did quote
the book through the character’s modern dialogue, it wasn’t in sync with the
original timeline. For example, it was in the beginning of the book that Eddi
(Elizabeth) mentioned, “If I marry him, Dad will never speak to me, and if I
don’t marry him, Mom will never speak to me.” It flowed into the natural
conversation, was a flashback to the original story, yet wasn’t verbatim. I
really liked the Austen flair recreated in a smooth fashion.
I found the story as a whole to flow very well and every POV
change was perfectly timed—I was ready to see what the next person’s story had when
it came.
But I gave this book three stars. Why?
One of the minor things was the characters’ vocations (and
this doesn’t affect my rating). Eddi didn’t really seem very lawyer-ry. It
mentioned her practice a few times, but it didn’t really feel like that was her
life. Just her vocation separate from the story. Same with Jenny (Jane) and her
coaching (the only reason I know she was a coach is because of the character
cast in the beginning). Or maybe it’s that most typical modern people don’t
include their jobs in normal conversation or off-work thoughts?
The two major things that altered my rating are what I
usually point out in reviews: spiritual content and romance.
Romance first. Linda’s story (the Lydia of the retelling)
was way too PG-13 for me. If it had never shown her POV, I think the story would
have been fine. There were a couple of more crude comments and insinuations made
by other characters, but Linda is where things really got too much for me. I
can see what the author was doing, and the storyline fits well for a retelling,
but… I had to skim almost every part with Linda. It goes from mentioning her
taking pregnancy control pills to sleeping with men to more detailed scenes
where she and a man are obviously in the middle of a sinful situation. I’d rather
not go into details in my review (because I *do* try to keep these PG or
above), but yeah… this is an adult book. I won’t keep it in my house because my
teenage sisters might pick it up, and I definitely do not want them exposed to
such content. If it weren’t for Linda’s parts, the other parts of romance
really weren’t too over-the-top.
Spiritual content is harder to judge because there were a
lot of mentions of God threaded throughout the whole book. But there is a
difference between mentions of God, church, and praying, and really LIVING the
Christian life. At one point, Eddi makes the comment, “I’m glad God means
something to you, because He means a lot to me.” That was the most spiritual
she was up to that point (my thoughts were, “If He does mean so much to you,
then why haven’t you thought of Him or prayed to Him yet?”). I don’t wish to be
harsh here, but it lacked genuine spiritual depth.
I enjoyed this book for the reasons mentioned above and really
didn’t like it for reasons mentioned above.
*I received this book from Bethany House and provided my
honest review*
Good points, Amanda, all the way around. This is something Christian authors should learn from, as a reminder of our responsibility to our readers. Christ should always shine through in our writing!
ReplyDeleteI feel like I might enjoy this retelling and the book covers his simple yet elegant.
ReplyDelete@ Ryana - so true; and very sobering!
ReplyDelete@ Melissa - yes, the cover is very unique! :)